What is the legacy of the pipeline
[ROBYN MCNICOL DEPUTATION SPEECH]
CLARENCE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
What is the legacy of this pipeline proposed to bring waste water 6 km’s across the Derwent and 6.8 km’s through the south arm peninsula just to irrigate a golf course. Its legacy brings devastating consequences to the indigenous cultural landscape and the natural environment.
The cultural landscape is rare/precious/intact and unique. There are visible and hidden cultural sites, for 10s of 1000’s of years arm end was a meeting place for our traditional peoples, this place tells a story about people, land, river and water – it signifies the entry to the Derwent visible from many places including Kingborough, Hobart and Clarence. Arm End was reserved as a recreational place of state significance. It is a place of value to many. People visit to view the bioluminescence, scuba dive, walk with family and friends, a destination for international or interstate visitor. It has potential to unite and reconcile white settlement with traditional owners. It is a place we can build a positive cultural history.
For the last 6 years the reserve has been embargoed and mothballed by the developer. No progress has been made, no significant rehabilitation, only failed plantings, there has been no serious consistent weed control or planting apart from coastcare work. The developer continues only to roll over permits, increase their scope and introduce new proposals. The community is prevented form enhancing the reserve. Now the community is being prevented to enter the Reserve. I have spoken with people in the aboriginal community and they are deeply hurt and offended, they did not endorse the golf course and they do not indorse the pipeline, the legacy of this pipeline is damage to Tasmanian Aboriginal Heritage.
The pipeline represents a risk to the natural coastal environment there is great potential for damage, and if this water spills into the river;
there are no mitigation plans for the survival of the endangered spotted Handfish, and
there are no management plans to stop existing vegetation being destroyed .
Access into the reserve will be restricted. The extensive golf course design does not allow for walking and neither does irrigation. No where in Tasmania is a public reserve subjected to artificial irrigation – no reserve is irrigated with nutrient rich environmentally risky water. The council should refer the biodiversity and the coastal protection codes in the Clarence City Council interim planning scheme and refuse this development.
The economic and social return from Arm End Reserve becoming a coastal cultural walk of significance far outweighs the damage this pipeline will do to our cultural and natural heritage.
ARM END WATER PLAN OUT OF BOUNDS
LETTER TO THE MERCURY DECEMBER 30 2018
[ROBERT OWENS - NEWTOWN]
At the entrance to the incredible Arm End reserve is a sign: “Welcome to The Arm End Public Recreation Reserve” and “Extensive walking and cycling tracks, cycling, bird-watching, open play spaces, fishing and nature interpretation, a world-class 18 hole golf course” Yes, this precious public asset, this incredibly beautifully peninsula - arguably the jewel in the crown of the Derwent, this site of state significance is going to be turned into a “golf course” and it needs water. I read in the Mercury, Sunday 16th December, that developers have submitted a DA to pipe water from Blackman’s Bay to the site. They describe it as “quality water”, the Mercury correctly points out that it is Class B water.
The use of recycled water comes with strict caveats. There are many, but to mention two. Taswater states in its document, “Using Recycled Water Safely”: www.taswater.com.au/Customers/Recycled-Water“In areas where there is public access, including golf courses, access to irrigation areas must be restricted for a minimum of four hours after irrigation or until irrigation area is dry”. And, “Recycled water irrigation must not occur if there is a risk that the public will sustain skin or aerosol contact”. So good people of the public, forget about taking the dog for a walk around Arm End before work. And, if you’re from South Arm and the developers have ‘dangled the carrot at you’ and told you you can access the “quality water”, don’t use it on your veggie garden or for the chooks, and make sure, if you use your sprinkler, it’s not within 100 metres of your home.
57 Representations were sent from individuals opposing the re-use pipeline via RITE
SUNDAY MERCURY ARTICLE
16 December 2018
Stop the Arm End effluent pipeline
Currently the Clarence City Council is assessing the Development Application Pipeline D-2018/455 lodged by the developer.
Read why we believe this application should be refused.
The Arm End golf course proponent wants to construct an effluent pipeline under the Derwent River and along South Arm Road to Arm End Reserve. The effluent pipeline will irrigate the long delayed golf course with treated water from the Blackman's Bay sewage treatment plant. Using effluent will exclude the public from Arm End reserve for lengthy periods and its use will turn many locals and visitors off ever visiting the reserve. The high nutrient effluent will damage regenerating native vegetation around the reserve's coast. The endangered spotted handfish will be at risk from drilling and spillage of effluent.
The only concession the community has from the golf course proponent was guaranteed public access at all times but they are now going back on that promise. This is the fourth alteration to the Arm End golf course proposal and this development by stealth must be stopped.
You can help us protect Arm End Reserve and the Spotted Handfish by making a representation to Clarence City Council. Fill out the form with your message to council.
The Clarence City Council (CCC) should refuse the pipeline because:
1. Severe impact on recreational access and enjoyment:
Irrigating the proposed golf course using treated effluent will prohibit the public from entering the reserve while irrigation is occurring and for a lengthy period afterwards. Excluding the public and spraying effluent on Arm End Reserve contravenes the CCC Planning Scheme by:
impacting "adversely on the recreational use of the land" (18.104.22.168. Zone Purpose, Recreation Zone).
failing to "complement and enhance the use of the land for recreational purposes"
(18.3.5. Discretionary Use Performance Criteria, Recreation Zone).
2. Effluent impact on Natural Values of Arm End and adjacent areas
The use of high nutrient effluent to irrigate 40 hectares of the Arm End Reserve (greens and fairways) and the potential for effluent to go beyond the target area (spray drift and flow) will have:
unacceptable impacts on the reserves native vegetation including threatened plants, contrary to the CCC Planning Scheme (27.1 Purpose, Natural Values Code); and
unacceptable impacts on the natural values outside the reserve e.g. local beaches and bays including the Spotted Handfish population at Mary Ann Bay, contrary to the CCC Planning Scheme
(2.1. Purpose and 3.0. Objectives (see note).
3. Impact of treated effluent on native species not assessed
The use of treated effluent will have negative impacts on nutrient intolerant native species and benefit many weed species, which has not been assessed and is contrary to CCC Planning Scheme assessment requirements (E.27.5 Application Requirements, Natural Assets Code).
4. Installation and operation of pipeline could destroy Spotted Handfish population at Halfmoon Bay
The drilling and installation of the pipeline underneath Halfmoon Bay could go dangerously wrong and damage the habitat of the endangered handfish. Contrary to the CCC Planning Scheme, no provisions are in place for preventing drilling accidents or mitigating impacts if they occur. (2.1. Purpose and 3.0. Objectives - see note).
During its operation the pipeline could be damaged and effluent damage the Halfmoon Bay Spotted Handfish adults and their eggs during the breeding season. Contrary to the CCC Planning Scheme, no provisions are in place for preventing pipe damage or mitigating impacts if it occurs (2.1. Purpose and 3.0. Objectives - see note).
NOTE: While the municipal boundary only extends to the high tide mark, the proponent must have regard to the Planning Scheme purpose and objectives that require a development to be sustainable and threatened species protected